What do you think of when you see a “milk-aholic” baby named Lindsay? Well, according to the New York Post, actress Lindsay Lohan thinks you’ll think of her. Lohan is suing E-Trade on the grounds that the substance-abusing baby in their Superbowl commercial is based on her.
Lohan’s lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, is demanding that the commercial be taken off the air and every copy of the spot be rounded up. The actress is also asking for $100 million from E-Trade for exemplary and compensatory damages.
No, E-Trade didn’t call the baby Lohan, or give the baby any other Lohan-characteristics, but Lohan’s lawyer makes the argument, “Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit… They used the name Lindsay…They’re using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn’t they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody’s talking about it and saying it’s Lindsay Lohan.”
When I saw the spot, Lindsay Lohan wasn’t the first thing I thought of, and I think Lindsay is a pretty mainstream name which probably won’t help Lohan’s case. Now if the baby was named Madonna and had arms like a Transformer- then I would understand the one name subliminal messaging- but I just didn’t get that here.
Maybe this is a publicity stunt by Lohan, or maybe she is legitimately offended by the commercial- whatever the case may be- it will be interesting to see the verdict.
The lesson to be learned here for advertisers: be careful what you name your baby.